Stackbabbin' Bumscags

It's more like a "Yes, we know our country is fucking stupid, now stop talking about it."

Christ, heaven forbid some kids decide to play Cops and Robbers during recess.. I find my decision to become a recluse a good one.

> iOS only at the moment God dammit.

Do want.

Which will be followed by an even bigger leap backwards. Besides, the Online Passes were just a way for them to recoup losses from people purchasing Used copies of games without the knowledge that you wouldn't have access to any Online Multiplayer functions without the Online Pass.

I've seen someone play Costume Quest, haven't played. Haven't touched Stacking either, and I watched someone play through a little bit of Brutal Legend, but never beat it, and never played. Gah, I wish I had money.

I'll take one.

Don't forget the Nissan Leaf charging station, with Nissan in giant red lettering on the structure. Funnily enough, EA said it was shutting down The Sims Social, so 's kinda odd that they'd add anything to it.

Hooray for new spoilers. [spoiler2] .gif' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /> https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6935541248/h421400D4/ [/spoiler2]

Why in the bloody fuck would we need porn on here? It's a 3 second Google image search for fuck's sake.

Make an NSFW emote or something, that way people can put it in a post or, maybe say "NSFW by the way" before said spoiler.

We already have a NWS tag, it was used on the Freaky Fetish thread, though strictly for thread titles and not posts.

We were doing perfectly fine in the Fetish thread when it wasn't stowed away like some rash we're ashamed of.

Why is there an age requirement for the subforum?

It just strikes me as completely unnecessary that we'd need a passworded subforum for "controversial topics" and "mature discussions", when we should be able to handle it. Maybe add in a rule stating that threads must be named what the topic of discussion is, that way people can avoid those threads, but making a subforum just seems a bit excessive.

Are we not mature enough to be able to handle discussions on our own? I can name users that make ad hominem attacks on one hand, we already have a rule for not being a douchebag. Since threads are usually titled with something relevant to the discussion at hand, it's already a user's choice whether or not to look into a thread that's about a controversial topic. Any discomfort experienced on their part is their fault.

Except that's still attacking the person in a way, so that rule contradicts itself. Agreed. Why exactly do we have to have a different subforum for this when we can simply amend some rules for discussion?

Wait, "attack their actions"? The fuck does that mean?

So, what exactly defines "controversial topics"? Because damn near anything can be labeled as a controversial topic.

Because it gets the media companies views, still.

Oh if only there hadn't been any rulings in their favor in court. The sad thing is that there's absolutely nothing anyone can do to the Westboro Cult until they slip up and break the law. However since most of the cult comprises of the Phelps clan, most of whom are lawyers, there's no way in hell they're going to break the law unless provoked.

Of course they are.. -Sigh-

Found out the Marathon was being run this year in honor of the victims of the Newtown shooting, with some families of the victims at the race. You can rest at ease, the fire in the JFK library was an unrelated event, fire in the mechanical room and not another detonation. They've currently got a Saudi national in custody it seems.