Jump to content

Huff

Moderator
  • Content Count

    6601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    259

Posts posted by Huff


  1. 1 hour ago, TheOnlyGuyEver said:

    Stamda was annoying last I talked to him. Good guy at heart but damn.

    I've said it once I'll say it again I'm pissed off at the guy for deliberately throwing away all of the good memories and relics of the cool shit we all did. Like man drifting apart happens but at least leave those personalized tf2 gifts alone.

     

     


  2. 10 minutes ago, Stackbabbin' Bumscags said:

    Didn't Stamda get semi-YouTube popular or something?

    He has a sizeable tumblr following, sometimes I see his posts on my dash 

     

    1 hour ago, Moby said:

     

    What did even happen with him again?

    Seems that him, mono and Stamda decided to just stop existing and cut ties with everyone.

    Marco’s one of those people I actually without irony have to hope didn’t kill themselves. Last any of us heard from him was... February 2017? He kept having school trouble and struggled with what I’m pretty sure was severe depression

    No idea where Mono is, he just up and vanished too.


  3. 1 hour ago, kayohgee said:

    This is such a bizarre argument to make in this particular case. The only way the government is "controlling" the internet is having a regulation that no one is allowed to control the internet. Your stance is basically akin to this:

     

    Major automotive companies start adopting highways across the United States. They are granted permits to set up toll stations along the highways they own, so that on a road owned by Toyota, only owners of Toyota cars can expect to drive with any expectation of a reliable speed. Drivers of every other brand have to drive in slow lanes, or pay tolls to get into faster lanes, or may not be able to drive on those roads at all. Clearly no one wants this. The government steps in and says "This fucking sucks. Roads need to be reliable and accessible to everyone within reason." and sets up a regulation to end the practice. By your logic, the government is being the tyrannical party in this situation even though it's clear they're acting in the best interests of the public, which is their job.

    Exactly this dude. Sometimes the government actually protects our freedums, believe it or not.


  4. 14 hours ago, John Caveson said:

    I'm actually conflicted on this. On one hand, the monopolized ISPs wan't to do away with Net Neutrality, on the other, the monopolized tech/social media companies want to keep it, and that's sending me red flags all around. I mean, do we really want the government to keep the power to regulate this stuff? I mean, if it goes anything like cable or other utilities, I say get rid of it.

     

    1908B866-49CB-4FA0-B60B-E245C35DE466.jpeg

×