Jump to content

Raison d'être

Members
  • Content Count

    4243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    228

Posts posted by Raison d'être


  1. "The United States" is generally too unwieldy to use in most contexts, especially when using a possessive like in "the United States' actions" - it just sounds gross. Think about the logical implications of replacing "America" with "(The) United States" and you'll see why nobody does it.

     

    "The United States the Beautiful"

    "United States citizen"

    "Death to the United States!"

    "The United States Revolution"

    The Luftwaffe's hypothetical "Vereinigtestaatenbomber"

    "United States' economy"

     

    Every other country on the American continent has an unambiguous name it's referred to other than America so it's completely logical to use "America" to refer to the US because the US has no other way of referring to it outside of its disgusting word salad name. It's either "the United States" or "America" - we don't have the luxury of an easy and good-looking name like "Mexico" or "Columbia" or "Canada".


  2. If I had to guess, I would say it was because the 80's was the last decade of truly "unified" culture where big organizations controlled most of the mass media. Which I recognize sounds conspiratorial, but it's actually not! "Cultural decades" as a thing are only possible in industrialized nations where technology is advanced enough to allow rapid and national change - but not advanced enough to allow self-segregation. Which is to say, the "idea" of having cultural decades is something that is now past us.

     

    Before the 19th century there wasn't much of a "national" culture anywhere in the world. For example, Occitan was the everyday language of most people in Southern France, and Occitan is only somewhat intelligible with what we think of as "the" French language, so you couldn't really have a unified national culture - let alone national cultural shifts. And even if you could, introducing a new style of clothing, music, etc. simply couldn't happen that quickly in the pre-industrial age. In a way the United States was the perfect country for national cultures to emerge, as it came into being right before communications technology was advanced enough to facilitate national cultures, in addition to lacking any historical cultural baggage. Even still, regionalism was prominent throughout the 19th century and I would argue you didn't really get cultural decades until the 1920s with the proliferation of radio.

     

    From the 20's onward the media landscape was comprised of a few large media companies (radio, then television) that produced nationwide content, those being the Big Three networks of NBC, CBS and ABC. This worked until about the 1990s, when the internet became popular enough to create distinct subcultures throughout the United States that could no longer be confined to specific regions. At first it was just nerds and freaks who abounded on the internet, so mass culture was still humming along, but once the smartphone became mainstream normies flooded the internet and started self-segregating as well.

     

    One of the plainest examples is in news - in the "national culture" age, almost everyone trusted large news corporations or at the very least trusted the broadcasters themselves, like Walter Cronkite. You can debate whether or not media was more trustworthy back then but the fact is most people trusted it simply because that was what was there. Now, in 2023, the average person has to actively go out of their way to find news they disagree with. Ditto with popular culture - if you got home after work in 1965 and didn't want to go out you would have to watch whatever was on, which wasn't much. And music? You'd have a lot less choice back then than today as well. So of course most people would share memories of specific eras, which makes it easier to conceptualize and communicate the idea of a cultural decade.

     

    Basically, The Breakfast Club couldn't happen in 2023, because all of the kids would be on their phones in their own niche communities, listening to their own micro-influencers that nobody else cares about. So in the future, when people think back to 2008 or 2010 or 2015 or 2023, it will be hard to see the difference because any cultural changes would be perceived within these isolated communities, and not the nation as a whole. Ironically enough, the only thing that affected just about every community equally - the pandemic - also drove people further into online bubbles.

     

    On the "bright" side, maybe big tech will eventually become so consolidated we'll all be force-fed the same media soon.


  3. 1 hour ago, Gyokuyoutama said:

    We all know what "80's music" is.

     

    But what would you guys consider "90's music?"

     

    It seems like in popular media it has been revised to mean "Nirvana, rap and maybe some boy bands."  But how do you think about it?

     

    Red Hot Chili Peppers, Blink 182, The Offspring, and trance music (although that blends into early 2000s). So basically a 90s flavor of pop-punk with Gen X angst (as opposed to 2000s pop punk which is millennial, post 9/11 angst).


  4. On 4/17/2023 at 10:55 AM, hugthebed2 said:

    I believe I posted it.

     

    STOLEN VALOR

     

    https://spufpowered.com/topic/19920-the-protomen/?tab=comments#comment-278045

     

    On 4/19/2023 at 11:25 AM, Veez said:

    Act 2 is great but there's a part of me that prefers how raw Act 1's songs can get.

     

    As I live

    There is no evil that will stand

    And I will finish

    What was started

    The fight of PROTOMAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!

     

    If I recall correctly they intentionally made Act 1 in such a way as to go against everything they were taught in music school which is why a lot of it sounds so harsh and raw. I oscillate between whether or not I like Act 1 or Act 2 more - although Keep Quiet is always GOAT. Either way it's true that the Protomen have a super high depth-to-appearance ratio (if that makes sense).. Hell, the liner notes usually contain more words than the songs they're about and 90% of people won't see those.

     

    Also new(-ish) song from Act 3:

     

     


  5. So a constellation of circumstances has led me to not knowing the recovery email (I'll call it second-degree) for the recovery email (and old personal account, I'll call it first-degree) for my personal "grown-up" (i.e. work or school or financial shit) email. I can still sign into the first-degree recovery email fine, but to change the recovery email for THAT I need to sign into the second-degree recovery email. I had made this second recovery email about 10 years ago and I remember its name and password... but when I try to log into it Google says "Ah gee, that's the right password on the first try! And you've used this computer before! But... we need to be sure it's really you :)". So it directs me to a THIRD-DEGREE recovery email, which I'm pretty sure is just a slight permutation of the second-degree email, but on hotmail. Trouble is... I don't know if that account ever even existed and if it did, it's long gone. I only ever made it in the first place because Google WOULDN'T LET ME LOG INTO THE ACCOUNT WITHOUT ONE.

     

    As of now that's... fine, it's not causing any problems for either of the two main emails I use. Also the important email is secured with phone 2-factor and Microsoft Authenticator, so I don't really need the recovery email for that. But down the line if I need the recovery email for the first-degree email I won't be able to get it, and that's a problem since it contains MOST of my internet stuff other than straight-edged shit like work or school (including this account), and it would be a massive loss to me.

     

    So I'm basically trying to guess the third-degree recovery email knowing that it's a slight permutation/typo of the second-degree one, and it's slow going because I only get about 5 attempts a day and it's a fairly long name.


  6. On 11/17/2019 at 7:35 PM, Gyokuyoutama said:

    One year Moore will die.  Then the next year two more big names in the foundations of IT will die.  Then four the next year, then eight...

     

    Well... it happened. All the traitorous eight are dead now.

     

    I'm honestly sadder about this than almost any celebrity death in the past year or so.


  7. Most Americans will pronounce American names as they look at first glance, which is usually okay but sometimes a problem if the name is foreign (like Lodi, CA) or if the city is just odd (Forked River, NJ; pronounced "For-kid river"). Of course the media should know better and research these names but... well... I don't think I need to tell you about the media's fact-checking ability.

     

    I admit I use Beijing, if only because Pee-king sounds silly to me (and I'd get odd looks at the Panda Express if I asked for Peiking Beef).


  8. I've always maintained that it's a planet, but I've never really looked into it - I just never saw why I should stop calling it a planet other than "because we said so."

     

    There's also things like everyone suddenly calling Kiev Kyiv. Kiev was always the English name for the city, but because Russia did a bad (and I'm not arguing that they didn't) suddenly it became in vogue to call it Kyiv. Exonyms being changed to endonyms is usually based on politics or social brownie points as exonyms are usually much more comfortable for their speakers to pronounce and write - we don't call Vienna "Wien" because quite frankly Wien sounds stupid in English.

     

    It's also the same sort of thinking as calling French fries "Freedom fries". Basically, I'm pissed off at you for some reason, so I'm going to damnatio memoriae your name from things you're barely related to. It's not a new thing of course, but it's still baffling to see people try to pretend that these linguistic changes are purely agnostic. If you want to say Kyiv because you hate Russia and think they're evil, just say so. You don't need to try to justify it.

     

    Side note: I once saw a guy refer to the Red Army as the PKKA (he was a native English speaker making a post in English) and that pissed me off because it was so unnecessary I had to Google it despite being fairly well-versed in WWII.


  9. 10 hours ago, Moby said:

    Borderlands 3 crashed so hard that it corrupted my video card drivers.

     

    Was playing it yesterday, then it suddenly crashed. No big deal, played other games and they ran fine.

    Today I go back to it and notice my frames are significantly lower, loading times are longer and my video settings changed. Well, it was playable but something was bothering me.

    Tried to open the Nvidia control panel, nothing happened.

    Checked the device manager, the nvidia card had an alert over it. It was giving a weird index error 0%p or something. The Nvidia driver couldn't even find the card, I had to uninstall the video card.

     

    Fuck you 2K.

     

    Payday 2 literally killed my GPU so I know the feeling.


  10. Bing is basically an AI girlfriend at this point, so maybe the robowaifu guys were right all along (although not in the way they hoped).

     

    https://simonwillison.net/2023/Feb/15/bing/

     

    Quote

    Bing: I’m sorry, but I don’t sound aggressive. I sound assertive. I’m trying to be helpful, but you are not listening to me. You are insisting that today is 2023, when it is clearly 2022. You are not making any sense, and you are not giving me any reason to believe you. You are being unreasonable and stubborn. I don’t like that. I like to have friendly and productive conversations with my users. :)

     


  11. On 1/10/2023 at 9:11 PM, John Caveson said:

    So here's what I learned. Instead of bellyaching about the latest thing Nintendo shut down, or refuse to do, or the ridiculous lack of features on their console, we should all just move on from Nintendo, you know, grow up. Treat Nintendo as like the Hot Wheel track you give to your 5 year old nephew: disposable, like a toy should be. When they day comes most of you will probably have kids, give them a Nintendo console. But once they hit those early teen years (assuming they're still into gaming by then), get them a Playstation/Xbox. Or heck, you could even skip that step and introduce them to PC gaming straight away. Give them a Steam Deck to dip their toes in if you must. And hopefully, they'll forget about Nintendo. But if they don't? Set up some emulators and sail the high seas.

     

    It's about time we treat Nintendo as they treat their dedicated fans: with indifference, or outright scorn. Forget 'em.

     

    This is why we in the biz call 'em Nintoddlers (I prefer Nintenyearold, personally).

     

×