Got a '10 Accord a few years ago to replace my '92 Accord I had for 2 years before it. My '10 works, but it's not spectacularly good or bad. It just exists. Reliable, trustworthy, maintained, but boring. Hell, even the small dent in the bumper I got from backing into a short bollard is about the most notable thing that's happened to the car.
Now, my '92 was an old car - manual locks, crank windows, no radio - but it ran pretty well. Most of all, it had personality. Driving on a frame that low and with as old as the shocks were was pretty fun. I could feel the speed in that car. In my '10, I don't feel myself creeping past 80 most times. It's too cushy. For the last ~4 months of my ownership, it didn't even have a reliable power steering system, but I still find myself missing it, a little.
My car before my '92, and also my first car, was a '96 Sentra, which had similar personality. It also had no AC. In Vegas. The car itself ran solely on the fact that no one told it it couldn't. I rear-ended someone (at low speed - fast enough to buckle my hood, but barely scratched her bumper), which pushed the radiator to a slight angle, popped a hole in my battery's casing without damaging the battery itself, and knocked the headlight out of its mount so it just sat there unsecured. For half of my ownership the hood was strapped down - it wouldn't relatch, and I didn't bother permanently affixing it because my battery terminals were loose and would have the cord pop off randomly - with 3 bungee cords. It was a sight, and the car was a real POS, but it ran and its idiosyncrasies made it fun.
I guess I'm more "Millennium Falcon" than "Naboo yacht" when it comes to vehicles.