Huff

Rammite is my favourite mod now.

Today I learned stamda is responsible for the renamed Candy Cane meme on r/tf2 https://www.reddit.com/r/tf2/comments/3njdat/butt_hol_origins/

tfw gigolo isn't here to celebrate the 4th of july with us

“But “the egoist is someone who thinks only of himself!” — This would be someone who doesn’t know and relish all the joys that come from participation with others, i.e., from thinking of others as well, someone who lack countless pleasures — thus a poor sort. But why should this desolate loner be an egoist in comparison to richer sorts? Certainly, for a long time, we were able to get used to considering poverty a disgrace, as a crime, and the sacred socialists have clearly proven that the poor are treated like a criminals. But sacred socialists treat those who are in their eyes contemptibly poor in this way, just as much as the bourgeoisie do it to their poor.

But why should the person who is poorer with respect to a certain interest be called more egoistic than the one who possesses that interest? Is the oyster more egoistic that the dog; is the Moor more egoistic than the German; is the poor, scorned, Jewish junkman more egoistic than the enthusiastic socialist; is the vandal who destroys artworks for which he feels nothing more egoistic than the art connoisseur who treats the same works with great love and care because he has a feeling and interest for them? And now if someone — we leave it open whether such a one can be shown to exist — doesn’t find any “human” interest in human beings, if he doesn’t know how to appreciate them as human beings, wouldn’t he be a poorer egoist with regard to this interest rather than being, as the enemies of egoism claim, a model of egoism? One who loves a human being is richer, thanks to this love, than another who doesn’t love anyone.”

“But “the egoist is someone who thinks only of himself!” — This would be someone who doesn’t know and relish all the joys that come from participation with others, i.e., from thinking of others as well, someone who lack countless pleasures — thus a poor sort. But why should this desolate loner be an egoist in comparison to richer sorts? Certainly, for a long time, we were able to get used to considering poverty a disgrace, as a crime, and the sacred socialists have clearly proven that the poor are treated like a criminals. But sacred socialists treat those who are in their eyes contemptibly poor in this way, just as much as the bourgeoisie do it to their poor.

But why should the person who is poorer with respect to a certain interest be called more egoistic than the one who possesses that interest? Is the oyster more egoistic that the dog; is the Moor more egoistic than the German; is the poor, scorned, Jewish junkman more egoistic than the enthusiastic socialist; is the vandal who destroys artworks for which he feels nothing more egoistic than the art connoisseur who treats the same works with great love and care because he has a feeling and interest for them? And now if someone — we leave it open whether such a one can be shown to exist — doesn’t find any “human” interest in human beings, if he doesn’t know how to appreciate them as human beings, wouldn’t he be a poorer egoist with regard to this interest rather than being, as the enemies of egoism claim, a model of egoism? One who loves a human being is richer, thanks to this love, than another who doesn’t love anyone.”

chinese

Does SpufPowered auto-censor piss as jarate?

if not, it should really do that

Our topic today is: Pugs.

You know the rules, so play fair.

Go.

How did you upload those Axtinguisher web pages? I've got the entire Hunger Games threads, and it keeps telling me I'm not allowed to upload more than 500kb, which is just over a single web page. 

Miss u more and more every day big lad r.i.p

Miss u more and more every day big lad r.i.p

Miss u more and more every day big lad r.i.p

U

U

vvhen"s the next " h o t m e m e " coming out?

vvhen"s the next " h o t m e m e " coming out?

happy single shaming day you fucking loners(including me)

RIP Princess Leia

be careful not to choke on your words, mods

have a happy pillage-fest you turkey stuffing capitalist fucks

Have you heard about Trump being at odds with Hamilton? I'm convinced that he's going to build the fourth wall, now.

Yiff in hell, furfags

Bridget Jones's Baby was a surprisingly good conclusion to the series. Also Patrick Dempsey is too handsome for this world.

Bridget Jones's Baby was a surprisingly good conclusion to the series. Also Patrick Dempsey is too handsome for this world.

Any NIGGERS want to RP in Thunder Bluff?